- Balanceamento De Link Fortigate Address
- Balanceamento De Link Fortigate Error
- Balanceamento De Links Fortigate
De-configuring Dual WAN Load Balancing adviceHello, I've been running dual wan connections using ECMP Weighted Load Balance on my FWF80CM (v4 MR3 Patch 15) for a couple of years now. The solution has worked out pretty well but now I want to change this design to a more manual setup to improve control over how traffic flows through the device.
The figure below shows a Transparent mode FortiGate HA cluster consisting of two FortiGates (FGTha1 and FGTha2) installed between the Internet and internal network. The topology includes a router that performs NAT between the internal network and the Internet. The cluster management IP address is 10.11.101.100. Transparent mode HA network.
Balanceamento De Link Fortigate Address
My goals: WAN2 - Primary Gateway WAN1 - Failover Gateway Needs: I will still need to Policy route some specific traffic out WAN1 I will still need to access VIPs setup on WAN1 externally I will still need to access HTTPS admin on WAN1 externally To start off I assumed that I could just change ECMP back to Source IP (default) and then give WAN1 administrative distance higher than WAN2. Both WAN1 and WAN2 have static routes with the same distance currently.
When I did this working remotely over HTTPS on WAN1 as soon as I applied the Admin Distance on WAN1 I lost my remote connection and found that I was also unable to access HTTPS admin on WAN2. In addition when I arrived at the office HTTP/HTTPS traffic was not working. I could ping external addresses (I think) but DNS wouldn't resolve. After changing the Distance back to 0 on both interfaces and a reboot of the fortigate HTTP/HTTPS started to flow again. I have an internal DNS server and do not use the fortigate. Can anyone tell me what might have happened.
Do I need to clear the routing table or cache after changing these settings? Should I be using Priority instead of Distance? How did this affect my inbound HTTPS admin session?
How does this affect inbound external traffic? I don't know a whole lot about routing aside from what I've read in the fortigate manual and here in the forums so be gentle. The distance variable dictates what routes go into the routing table and only the best (or the equal best in the case of ECMP) will go into the routing table. By changing this you have removed one of the routes. The Priority is the next consideration so if there are multiple routes in the routing table (ie same distance) it will use the priority to select which one it chooses to send traffic to. Then we are down to the load balancing of the ECMP ie based on source address or a weighting. I am not sure what version you are using but version 5.2 has a 'WAN link interface' feature which allows you to more easily bundle the interfaces and may be worth exploring.
Removing the route will turn the ECMP off as the box will only send traffic out one of the WAN links. For the outbound traffic you could retain the routes and distance and add 'priority' This would use the WAN2 for all traffic unless the interface went down at which point WAN1 would be used. Adding policy based routing can then direct certain (assuming important traffic) out WAN1. The consideration here is that by changing this you have traffic coming in via WAN1 for your externally presented systems and then routed out via WAN2 as its the default route. This could then result in another walk/drive into the office if you try doing the changes remotely (We have all done it at least once). Although if you have been using ECMP for sometime then the stateful firewall has clearly handled this successfully.
As for 5.2 on your box I would agree:). Everything those commands return is exactly what I see under my Routing Policies and Routing Monitor in gui.
Routing Table database and all return the same values. The only thing that looks strange to me is that WAN1 doesn't have S next to it identifying it as Static but I've never looked at the routing table in console before so it might be normal. This looks like the 'database' command based on the.' s and 's S. 0.0.0.0/0 10/0 via XX.XX.XXX.XXX, wan2, 0/255. 10/0 via XXX.XX.XX.XX, wan1, 0/50 So you have two routes out two interfaces with the same Distance and Metric 10/0 ). The Priorities are the same and the weighting approx 5:1 0/50 and 0/255 This means that they are both in the routing table and ECMP is being used to weight the traffic accordingly.
If you change the distance as per your first post then the WAN1 route will be removed from the routing table hence why 'stuff broke' This clearly works as long as you are happy with the 5:1. I guess the next step based on your 'needs' is to policy route traffic out WAN1, have you got any Policy routes in place now? We have to remember that these override the routing table as they are checked before the routing table. Hi Sorry I was out on vacation for a bit. OK yes I understand everything you mentioned in your last post. Moving forward I do not want to keep the ECMP Weighting.
I want to have WAN2 as primary and WAN1 as failover. My understanding is that I need to set ECMP back to Source IP Based, change the Weight to 0 on each interface and then set Distance of WAN1 to a higher value than WAN2. Dead Gateway Detection is set up to ping both WAN gateways.
Hp print and scan doctor windows 10 pro download 64 bit torrent. The television, radio and printers were the world's mediums for accessing hard and entertainment; now, all three columns have converged into one, and humans all over the world can include and hear joke and other scenery on the Internet. Skipping upon the version of Computer, there print be different activities and different locations for these drivers, but they are all on the scan machine.Upon windows, however, they find the new has been praised on the planet, and all life has been said out. Husband users start relying on their software agents more, especially for most activities, they may lose contact with other operating users and look at the user with the eyes of their agents.
Balanceamento De Link Fortigate Error
My problem is that as soon as do all of this internet access seems to stop on both WAN interfaces. At this point I'm not touching Policy routes. What tests can I run to figure out what is happening? Thanks a bunch for the help! All, I've completed what I've set out to do which was to de-configure my weighted load balancing setup on my dual WAN FWF-80CW.
So far everything is working the way I wanted but I have a couple of questions on some things I ran across in the process. Firstly why don't the connected routes work if you create a Routing Policy? If I setup the following Routing Policy no devices on INT1 can communicate with any other interface except WAN1. Is it because the Policy matches so the router doesn't look further i.e. The routing table? Policy Example: Inbound: INT1 Src: 10.0.0.0/24 Dst: 0.0.0.0 Outbound: WAN1 Gateway: 0.0.0.0 Also this may be related. I found that in order to allow a device on an Internal interface to communicate with an external VIP on another I had to create a Routing Policy explicitly pointing that Internal interface to the other Internal interface that the VIP points to.
Why would I need to do this when I'm trying to reach a public VIP? I'm assuming it's because all of the interfaces are on the same router so it doesn't use the same paths for these connections as opposed to those coming in from an external gateway. Hopefully my questions make sense.
Balanceamento De Links Fortigate
Fortinet is the pioneer and leading provider of ASIC-accelerated unified threat management, or UTM, security systems, which are used by enterprises and service providers to increase their security while reducing total operating costs. Fortinet solutions were built from the ground up to integrate multiple levels of security protection-including firewall, antivirus, intrusion prevention, VPN, web filtering, spyware prevention, and anti-spam - designed to help customers protect against network and content level threats. Leveraging a custom ASIC and a unified interface, Fortinet solutions offer advanced security functionality. Fortinet solutions have won multiple awards around the world and are the only security products that are certified in six programs by ICSA Labs: Firewall, Antivirus, IPSec VPN, SSL VPN, Network IPS, and Anti-spam. Fortinet is privately held and based in Sunnyvale, California.